واکاوی مؤلفه‌ها و رهیافت‌های کارکرد تنظیم‌گری در حکمرانی اقتصاد دیجیتال

چکیده مقاله :

ﺑﺎ ﺗﻮﺟﻪ ﺑﻪ گستردگی زیست بوم اقتصاد دیجیتال و لزوم ایجاد و توسعه متوازن آن، ﻣﺄﻣﻮرﯾﺖ نهاد یا نهادهای تنظیم‌گری برای برقراری تعادل و توازن در بسترسازی اقتصاد دیجیتال و حکمرانی آن بسیار مهم است. در این راستا شناسایی و تحلیل مؤلفه‌ها و رهیافت‌های تنظیم‌گری به عنوان یکی از کارکردهای اصلی حکمرانی اقتصاد دیجیتال حائز اهمیت بوده و برای محقق شدن اهداف اقتصاد دیجیتال، نیازمند بررسی اسناد فرادست است تا بایسته‌ها و شایسته‌های قوانین و مقررات کشور لحاظ گردد. به این ترتیب هدف از این پژوهش کیفی، احصای مؤلفه‌های تنظیم‌گری و پیشنهاد رهیافت‌ها در کارکرد تنظیم‌گری برای حکمرانی اقتصاد دیجیتال با بهره‌گیری از روش تحلیل مضمون است. در این پژوهش اسناد فرادست با استفاده از روش اسنادی بررسی شده و با رویکرد گزینش نظری، انتخاب شد. سپس با به‌کارگیری روش تحلیل مضمون و نگاشت در عناصر اصلی اقتصاد دیجیتال، مضامین پایه، سازمان‌دهنده و فراگیر شناسایی شده و براساس آن مؤلفه‌های تنظیم‌گری تبیین شد. نهایتاً رهیافت‌های کارکرد تنظیم‌گری اولیه برای حکمرانی اقتصاد دیجیتال پیشنهاد شده و با انجام فرایند دلفی و نظر خبرگان تنظیم‌گری و اقتصاد دیجیتال نهایی و تدوین شد. نتیجه این پژوهش، ضرورت توجه ویژه به مؤلفه‌های تنظیم‌گری شامل زیرساخت مدیریت و حکمرانی، زیرساخت ارتباطی و اطلاعاتی، مشارکت و همکاری و روابط بین‌الملل، زیرساخت ایمن‌سازی، خدمات دیجیتال دولت،  پلتفرم‌های دیجیتال، خدمات پايه ميزباني، خدمات شبكه در حوزه ديجيتال، داده و محتوا، خدمات كاربردي، سازوکارهای استقرار دیجیتالی شدن و توانمندسازی نیروی انسانی را نشان می‌دهد.

چکیده انگلیسی :

Given the vastness of the digital economy ecosystem and the need to create and develop it in a balanced way, the mission of the regulatory institutions is very important to establish balance and equilibrium in the digital economy and its governance. In this regard, identifying and analyzing the regulatory components and approaches as one of the main functions of digital economy governance is important, and it is necessary to examine the upstream documents to take into account the requirements and merits of the country's laws and regulations. Thus, the purpose of this qualitative research is to identify regulatory components and propose regulatory approaches for digital economy governance using the thematic analysis method. In this study, upstream documents were selected using the documentary method with a theoretical selection approach. Then, using the thematic analysis method and mapping to the main elements of the digital economy; primary, organizing, and all-encompassing themes were identified. Finally, the initial regulatory approaches for digital economy governance were proposed and compiled through the Delphi method and the opinions of regulatory and digital economy experts. The results of this research show the need for special attention to regulatory components including management and governance infrastructure, communication and information infrastructure, partnership and cooperation and international relations, security infrastructure, government digital services, digital platforms, basic hosting services, digital network services, data and content, application services, digitalization deployment mechanisms, and human resource empowerment

منابع و مأخذ:

1- Bavarsad, S.S. & Pourian Kazem, S. “Unveiling a New Roadmap for Digital Transformation”. The Journal of Science and Technology Policy Letters (JSTPL), 2021.
2- Rastaghi, H.N. & Dehghanian, H. “Epistemological Challenges in Technology Governance and Recommendations for the Islamic Republic of Iran”. The Journal of Science and Technology Policy Letters (JSTPL), 2021.
3- Nabiyi, F., Shamizanjani, M., & Garoosi Mokhtarzadeh, N. “Conceptualization of digital transformation strategy and identifying the principles and supporting capabilities for its formation with meta-synthesis approach”. The Journal of Science and Technology Policy Letters (JSTPL), 2024.
4- Rudyk, N.V., Niyazbekova, S.U., Yessymkhanova, Z.K., Toigambayev, S. K. “Development and Regulation of the Digital Economy in the Context of Competitiveness”. In: Bogoviz, A.V., Suglobov, A.E., Maloletko, A.N., Kaurova, O.V. (eds) Сooperation and Sustainable Development. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 245. Springer, Cham. 2022 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77000-6_20.
5- Petrovichi D., Lavernteva A. V. “Regulatory Policy for Digital Economy: Holistic Institutional Framework”. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, Vol. 15, No. 4 (2019), 33-44, 2019.
6- Sadeghizadeh, H. “Clarifying the Role of Governance in the Development of IoT Technological Innovation System in Iran”. Iranian Research Institute for Information Science and Technology (IranDoc), Vol. 38. No. 1. pp. 139-168. Autumn 2021. https://doi.org/10.35050/JIPM010.2022.016.
7- Scott, C. “Regulation in the age of governance: The rise of the post-regulatory state”. The politics of regulation: Institutions and regulatory reforms for the age of governance 145: 151-154, 2004.
8- Levi-Faur, D. “Regulation and regulatory governance”. Handbook on the Politics of Regulation 1 (1): 1-25, 2011.
9- Jemilohun, B. O. “Regulating Cyberspace: An Examination of Three Theories”, 2019.
10- Baldwin, R., Cave, M. & Lodge, M. “Understanding Regulation. Theory, Strategy, and Practice”, second edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
11- WEF (World Economic Forum). “Agile Regulation for the Fourth Industrial Revolution A Toolkit for Regulators”, DECEMBER, 2020.
12- Bukht, R., & Heeks, R. “Defining, Conceptualizing, and Measuring the Digital Economy”. Development Informatics working paper, 2017.
13- OECD. "OECD Digital Economy Outlook 2015, OECD Publishing", Paris, 2018. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264232440-en.
14- UNCTAD. "Manual for the Production of Statistics on the Digital Economy” (https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/dtlstict2021d2_en.pdf) based on OECD’s A Roadmap Toward a Common Framework for Measuring the Digital Economy. Report for the G20 Digital Economy Task Force, 2020.
15- UNCTAD. “Issues note on measuring e-commerce and the digital economy Background document for the discussions of the third meeting of the UNCTAD Working Group on Measuring E-Commerce and the Digital Economy”. Geneva. Items 3, 4, 5, and 6 of the provisional agenda, 2022.
16- Xianbin, T., Qiong, W. “Sustainable Digital Economy Through Good Governance: Mediating Roles of Social Reforms and Economic Policies”. Front. Psychol. 12:773022, 2021. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.773022.
17- Niu, F. “The Role of the Digital Economy in Rebuilding and Maintaining Social Governance Mechanisms”. Front. Public Health 9:819727, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.819727.
18- Linkov, I., Trump BD., Poinsatte-Jones K & Florin M-V. “Governance strategies for a sustainable digital world. Sustainability”. 10:440, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su10020440.
19- MacDonald, A., W., and Hasmath, R. “How citizens order their political mind: contemporary ideology in China,” in Proceeding of the Southern Political Science Association Annual Conference, (San Juan), 2020.
20- Ghasemzadeh, M., Khojasteh Bagherzadeh, H., & SalmaniShahmohammadi, A. “providing a governance model on online video platforms Emphasizing industry self-regulation”. Interdisciplinary Studies in Media and Culture, 11(2), 275-306, 2022.
21- Farhangi, M. M., & Golshani, A. "Clarification of Cyberspace Policymaking in the Islamic Republic of Iran (Requirements and modifications, within the scope of the objectives in the upstream documents)”. Islamic Revolution Research, 8(3), 111-132, 2019.
22- Hadizadeh, A., Yeganeh, H., & Mortazavi Kahangi, A. S. “Identifying and Prioritizing Areas and Requirements of Agile Regulation for the Development of Digital Economy in Iran”. Iranian Journal of Public Policy, 10(3), 51-69. doi: 10.22059/jppolicy.2024.98674, 2024.
23- Wang, F. “China's Regulatory Framework for Dynamic and Personalized Pricing in the Digital Economy”. Int'l J. Soc. Sci. Stud, 2022.
24- Beaumier, G., Kalomeni, K., Campbell‐Verduyn, M., Lenglet, M., Natile, S., Papin, M., ... & Zhang, F. “Global regulations for a digital economy: Between new and old challenges”. Global policy, 11(4), 515-522, 2020.
25- Peter Lovelock, “Framing Policies for The Digital Economy”, National University of Singapore (NUS) and UNDP (United Nations Development Programme), 2022.
26- European Center for International Political Economy (ECIPE). “Competition, Growth and Regulatory Heterogeneity in Europe’s Digital Economy”, 2016.
27- ICC Commission on the Digital Economy. “Regulatory Modernization in The Digital Economy: Developing an Enabling Policy Environment for Innovation, Competition, And Growth”, 2016.
28- GSMA. “A New Regulatory Framework for the Digital Ecosystem”, 2016.
29- Jenner, B., Flick, U., von Kardoff, E., & Steinke, I. “A companion to qualitative research: Sage”, 2004.
30- Braun, V. & Clarke, V. “Using thematic analysis in psychology”, Qualitative Research in Psychology, Vol. 3, No. 2, Pp. 77-101, 2006.
31- Holloway, I. & Todres, L. “The Status of Method: Flexibility, Consistency, and Coherence”, Qualitative Research, Vol. 3, No. 3, Pp. 345-357, 2023.