Cognitive Reflection and the Coronavirus Conspiracy Beliefs
Subject Areas :Hashem Sadeghiyeh 1 , Iman Khanahmadi 2 , پروانه فرهاد بیگی 3 , نگار کریمی 4 , Nima ganji 5
1 -
2 -
3 -
4 -
5 -
Keywords:
Abstract :
Introduction: The COVID-19 pandemic reminded us of how quickly conspiracy ideas can spread and how dire their consequences could be. One important question is what traits would predict susceptibility to conspiracy beliefs. Previous research pointed to one of those traits: reflective versus intuitive cognitive style. Method: Here we examined how cognitive style correlates with founded and unfounded beliefs about the origin of COVID-19. A sample of 173 Iranians rated the likelihood of different beliefs about the origin of the new coronavirus and answered the original Cognitive Reflection Test. Results: In line with previous research, the reflective responses were negatively correlated with conspiracy beliefs and positively correlated with the founded statement (that the virus was spread from wild animals by chance). The reverse pattern was found for the intuitive responses. Conclusion: The results accrue more evidence in support of a relationship between reflective-analytic style of thinking and the tendency to reject conspiracy beliefs.
1. Frederick S. Cognitive reflection and decision making. Journal of Economic perspectives. 2005;19(4):25-42.
2. Pummerer L, Lilleholt L, Winter K, Zettler I. Societal effects of corona conspiracy theories.2020. PsyArXiv.
3. Erceg N, Ružojčić M, Galic Z. Misbehaving in the corona crisis: The role of anxiety and unfounded beliefs. 2020. PsyArXiv.
4. Freeman D, Waite F, Rosebrock L, Petit A, Causier C, East A, Jenner L, Teale AL, Carr L, Mulhall S, Bold E. Coronavirus conspiracy beliefs, mistrust, and compliance with government guidelines in England. Psychological Medicine. 2020;21:1-30.
5. Allington D, Duffy B, Wessely S, Dhavan N, Rubin J. Health-protective behaviour, social media usage and conspiracy belief during the COVID-19 public health emergency. Psychological medicine. 2020;9:1-7.
6. Butler LD, Koopman C, Zimbardo PG. The psychological impact of viewing the film" JFK": Emotions, beliefs, and political behavioral intentions. Political psychology. 1995;1:237-57.
7. Jolley D, Douglas KM. The social consequences of conspiracism: Exposure to conspiracy theories decreases intentions to engage in politics and to reduce one's carbon footprint. British Journal of Psychology. 2014;105(1):35-56.
8. Uscinski JE, Olivella S. The conditional effect of conspiracy thinking on attitudes toward climate change. Research & Politics. 2017;4(4):2053168017743105.
9. Sunstein CR, Vermeule A. Conspiracy theories: Causes and cures. Journal of Political Philosophy. 2009;17(2):202-27.
10. Byford J. Conspiracy theories: A critical introduction. Springer; 2011.
11. Goertzel T. Belief in conspiracy theories. Political psychology. 1994;1:731-42.
12. Dagnall N, Drinkwater K, Parker A, Denovan A, Parton M. Conspiracy theory and cognitive style: a worldview. Frontiers in psychology. 2015; 25;6:206.
13. Swami V, Chamorro‐Premuzic T, Furnham A. Unanswered questions: A preliminary investigation of personality and individual difference predictors of 9/11 conspiracist beliefs. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 2010;24(6):749-61.
14. McCauley C, Jacques S. The popularity of conspiracy theories of presidential assassination: A Bayesian analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1979;37(5):637.
15. Stempel C, Hargrove T, Stempel III GH. Media use, social structure, and belief in 9/11 conspiracy theories. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly. 2007;84(2):353-72.
16. Uscinski JE, Parent JM. American conspiracy theories. Oxford University Press; 2014.
17. Imhoff R, Bruder M. Speaking (un‐) truth to power: Conspiracy mentality as a generalised political attitude. European Journal of Personality. 2014;28(1):25-43.
18. Drinkwater K, Dagnall N, Parker A. Reality testing, conspiracy theories, and paranormal beliefs. Journal of Parapsychology. 2012;76(1):57-77.
19. Whitson JA, Galinsky AD. Lacking increases illusory pattern perception. science. 2008;322(5898):115-7.
20. Sullivan D, Landau MJ, Rothschild ZK. An existential function of enemyship: Evidence that people attribute influence to personal and political enemies to compensate for threats to control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 2010;98(3):434.
21. Lewandowsky S, Gignac GE, Oberauer K. The role of conspiracist ideation and worldviews in predicting rejection of science. PloS one. 2013;8(10):e75637.
22. Wood MJ, Douglas KM, Sutton RM. Dead and alive: Beliefs in contradictory conspiracy theories. Social psychological and personality science. 2012;3(6):767-73.
23. Darwin H, Neave N, Holmes J. Belief in conspiracy theories. The role of paranormal belief, paranoid ideation and schizotypy. Personality and Individual Differences. 2011;50(8):1289-93.
24. Newheiser AK, Farias M, Tausch N. The functional nature of conspiracy beliefs: Examining the underpinnings of belief in the Da Vinci Code conspiracy. Personality and Individual Differences. 2011;51(8):1007-11.
25. Lobato E, Mendoza J, Sims V, Chin M. Examining the relationship between conspiracy theories, paranormal beliefs, and pseudoscience acceptance among a university population. Applied Cognitive Psychology. 2014;28(5):617-25.
26. Moscovici S. The conspiracy mentality. InChanging conceptions of conspiracy 1987 (pp. 151-169). Springer, New York, NY.
27. Abalakina‐Paap M, Stephan WG, Craig T, Gregory WL. Beliefs in conspiracies. Political Psychology. 1999;20(3):637-47.
28. Barron D, Morgan K, Towell T, Altemeyer B, Swami V. Associations between schizotypy and belief in conspiracist ideation. Personality and Individual Differences. 2014;70:156-9.
29. Douglas KM, Sutton RM. The hidden impact of conspiracy theories: Perceived and actual influence of theories surrounding the death of Princess Diana. The Journal of social psychology. 2008;148(2):210-22.
30. Holm N. Conspiracy theorizing surveillance: considering modalities of paranoia and conspiracy in surveillance studies. Surveillance & Society. 2009;7(1):36-48.
31. Pechey R, Halligan P. The prevalence of delusion-like beliefs relative to sociocultural beliefs in the general population. Psychopathology. 2011;44(2):106-15.
32. Gilbert P, Boxall M, Cheung M, Irons C. The relation of paranoid ideation and social anxiety in a mixed clinical population. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy. 2005;12(2):124-33.
33. Freeman D, Garety PA, Bebbington PE, Smith B, Rollinson R, Fowler D, Kuipers E, Ray K, Dunn G. Psychological investigation of the structure of paranoia in a non-clinical population. The British Journal of Psychiatry. 2005;186(5):427-35.
34. Irwin HJ, Wilson K. Anomalous experiences and the intuitive-experiential style of thinking. Journal of the Society for Psychical Research. 2013;77(911):2.
35. Pacini R, Epstein S. The relation of rational and experiential information processing styles to personality, basic beliefs, and the ratio-bias phenomenon. Journal of personality and social psychology. 1999;76(6):972.
36. Kahneman D. Thinking, fast and slow. Macmillan; 2011.
37. Pennycook G, Cheyne JA, Koehler DJ, Fugelsang JA. Is the cognitive reflection test a measure of both reflection and intuition?. Behavior Research Methods. 2016;48(1):341-8.
38. Toplak ME, West RF, Stanovich KE. The Cognitive Reflection Test as a predictor of performance on heuristics-and-biases tasks. Memory & cognition. 2011;39(7):1275.
39. Shenhav A, Rand DG, Greene JD. Divine intuition: Cognitive style influences belief in God. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 2012;141(3):423.
40. Gervais WM, Norenzayan A. Analytic thinking promotes religious disbelief. Science. 2012;336(6080):493-6.
41. Pennycook G, Cheyne JA, Seli P, Koehler DJ, Fugelsang JA. Analytic cognitive style predicts religious and paranormal belief. Cognition. 2012;123(3):335-46.
42. Pennycook G, Rand DG. Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning. Cognition. 2019;188:39-50.
43. Deppe KD, Gonzalez FJ, Neiman J, Pahlke J, Smith K, Hibbing JR. Reflective liberals and intuitive conservatives: A look at the Cognitive Reflection Test and ideology.
44. Ståhl T, Van Prooijen JW. Epistemic rationality: Skepticism toward unfounded beliefs requires sufficient cognitive ability and motivation to be rational. Personality and Individual Differences. 2018;122:155-63.
45. Swami V, Voracek M, Stieger S, Tran US, Furnham A. Analytic thinking reduces belief in conspiracy theories. Cognition. 2014;133(3):572-85.
46. van Prooijen JW, Douglas KM, De Inocencio C. Connecting the dots: Illusory pattern perception predicts belief in conspiracies and the supernatural. European journal of social psychology. 2018;48(3):320-35.
47. Bruder M, Haffke P, Neave N, Nouripanah N, Imhoff R. Measuring individual differences in generic beliefs in conspiracy theories across cultures: Conspiracy Mentality Questionnaire. Frontiers in psychology. 2013;4:225.
48. Norenzayan A, Gervais WM. The origins of religious disbelief. Trends in cognitive sciences. 2013;17(1):20-5.
49. Barrett JL. Exploring the natural foundations of religion. Trends in cognitive sciences. 2000;4(1):29-34.
50. Sinayev A, Peters E. Cognitive reflection vs. calculation in decision making. Frontiers in Psychology. 2015;6:532.